editor decision started nature rejection
Editage Insights is funded by Editage and endorses services provided by Editage but is editorially independent. Performance & security by Cloudflare. b. I regret giving them his address. Editor decision started might sound like the editor is going to bench reject your paper, but thats not necessarily the case. //--> 1) After submission, the system shows that Manuscript under consideration, which means that it is being evaluated by the editor; 2) If the latest status becomes Editor decision started, it means it has been sent for review (you can also check whether there is reviewer.zip in the file list, if yes, it means it is sent . However, when they communicated their decision to the Editor-in-Chief (EiC), who makes the final decision, it was decided to reconsider your manuscript. What does the distribution of wait times for a editor decision look like for a manuscript submitted to Science or Nature? Congratulations! You could ask how soon they think they will answer, or give a deadline yourself, warning them that, after that deadline without having heard, you will submit the text to another publisher. 9.3 weeks. Subscribe and get curated content that will give impetus to your research paper. edit: so no. Special attention is paid by the editors to the readability of submitted material. 1) After submission, the system shows that Manuscript under consideration, which means that it is being evaluated by the editor; 2) If the latest status becomes Editor decision started, it means it has been sent for review (you can also check whether there is reviewer.zip in the file list, if yes, it means it is sent All peer-reviewed content will carry an anonymous statement of peer reviewer acknowledgement, and for those reviewers who give their consent, we will publish their names alongside the published article. Usually they decide in less than a week after the initial submission. Anyone you share the following link with will be able to read this content: Sorry, a shareable link is not currently available for this article. Decisions by editors are routinely made very rapidly after receipt of reports, and Nature offers an advance online publication (AOP) service to an increasing number of manuscripts. round 1""nature nature metabolism. They are, instead, rewarded non-financially by means of acknowledgment in journals, positions on editorial boards, free journal access, discounts on author fees, etc. What does a quick change from 'Under consideration' to 'Decision made' back to 'Under consideration' mean for Nature? When facing rejection, many of us don't even know that there is a formal process of appealing the decision. Which type of forging is used for Flashless forging? Overall, it is relatively uncommon for new information to completely change our view of a manuscript, and we ultimately uphold our original decisions in over 90% of cases. The content of the press release mailing and papers described therein is embargoed until 1600 London time/1100 US Eastern Time on the day of publication, which is the time at which the research is published and become publicly available. New referees can often raise new sets of points, which complicates and lengthens the consideration process instead of simplifying it. any technical failings that need to be addressed before the authors' case is established. Should I write to the editor or wait for a response/change in status? Icons made by various authors from www.flaticon.com, Experiential Live Edit: How to improve Biomed manuscripts. Yes Nat Neurosci 5, 917 (2002). In light of such uncertainty, the threshold for reversing a decision must be set well above the level of 'noise' in the process: otherwise, decisions would simply go back and forth endlessly in a kind of Brownian motion. Even if the reviewers give positive recommendations, the editor can decide to reject a paper. //--> Editor rejected manuscript claiming it is similar to a not-yet-published manuscript (that I haven't seen). Once the decision has been made to peer-review the paper, the choice of referees is made by the editor who has been assigned the manuscript, who will be handling other papers in the same field, in consultation with editors handling submissions in related fields when necessary. It could mean just about anything. Some editors keep a paper for long time, more than 6 months or a year, without a decision and when send them a reminder message they do not reply or sometimes reply for the first time saying that . Confirm that you would also like to sign up for free personalized email coaching for this stage. The criteria for a paper to be sent for peer-review are that the results seem novel, arresting (illuminating, unexpected or surprising), and that the work described has both immediate and far-reaching implications. All referees agree to Nature's conditions before Nature sends them a manuscript to assess. Although Nature's editors regard it as essential that any technical failings noted by referees are addressed, they are not so strictly bound by referees editorial opinions as to whether the work belongs in Nature. The reviewers only make recommendations. This scheme only applies to original research Articles, and not to Review articles or to other published content. For those who have contemplated pleading for that precious second chance, we simply don't know where to start. We may reverse decisions in cases where a referee (or editor) has made a serious error of fact, but only if the error was crucial to the decision. After going through the reviewers comments, the editor will make a decision about your manuscript. rev2023.3.3.43278. Many papers are published online ahead of print publication date: corresponding authors of these papers will be informed by e-mail when the online publication date is confirmed, one week ahead of publication. ]]> Sign up for the Nature Briefing newsletter what matters in science, free to your inbox daily. Once your manuscript passes the initial quality check, we assign it to a member of Editorial Board, who is an active researcher in your field. Does "Under Review" mean that the paper has passed the editorial check? The above box-and-whisker plots show the days to decision for manuscripts submitted . [CDATA[// >
